Good governance for the city we love.

I moved to Boulder more than 40 years ago, loved it then, and love it now. I look back on those years joyfully and remain in awe of the beauty of our natural surroundings and our community.

Pragmatic, Positive, and Experienced Leadership

Providing the best outcomes for Boulder requires making choices in a non-ideological, pragmatic way. I believe most candidates agree on many of the destinations: housing affordability, wildfire resilience, good governance, a healthy downtown, reliable public services, and more. The difference is in the route we take to get there.

I will approach council service in an informed, solution-oriented way. More than four decades in Boulder and a varied career have given me perspective on a wide range of views. I will work to build consensus, state tradeoffs plainly, and focus on practical results that serve the whole community.

The sections below are focused and brief. Additional context can be found in my responses to questionnaires from local groups.

Running for council is the opportunity to join a team and collaborate with colleagues to provide the best outcome for the city. Developing a view after analyzing the facts and listening to peers on council and the public is what results in the best results.

If elected, I will listen carefully, with integrity, and focus on practical solutions.

The budget is one of council's most important policy documents. It is where priorities become real: every commitment means fewer resources for something else. Our current byzantine process is challenging for sitting council members to understand and almost a meaningless document for everybody else.

We should implement Priority Based Budgeting ("PBB"), similar to what Boulder County does. For each line item in the budget, PBB requires answers to four questions: 1) Does the service provide high value to residents? 2) Is it legally required? 3) Does it advance City Council priorities? 4) Can efficiency be improved before the service itself is reduced or eliminated?

The results from the PBB process are an open book, available for review. This allows everybody to understand what programs/service were funded and what was not and gain perspective. Increasing transparency is an important step to increasing the level of trust from city residents.

For significant capital projects such as Alpine-Balsam and CU South Flood Mitigation, there should be an easy to access dashboard showing progress in terms of both budget and time with simple green, yellow and red light measurements. When a project falls into the yellow or red, we should know why, what the city is doing to mitigate the issue and what alternatives are available to bring the project back into its original budget.

I believe we can do more with our current revenue stream and not solely ask voters to increase taxes. Applying a pragmatic common-sense approach to the process will yield significant results.

Wildfire preparedness is one of Boulder's most urgent responsibilities. With limited resources, the city should focus on measures that most reduce risk to the highest risk parts of town first (WUI 1/western edge) and over time incorporate WUI 2 locations. This would be combined with commensurate vegetation management on Open Space acreage. The solution needs to be connected and not completed in a scattered approach that does little to reduce overall risk.

Adopting the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) Essential and Enhanced standards for residential properties, specifically for those at higher risk, is a proven way to update properties to be more resilient to wildfire. A clear timeline for implementation is needed along with appropriate financial assistance.

Boulder should increase housing affordability for middle-income households through practical, cost-effective approaches, without treating higher density as the only solution. Housing decisions must account for their effects on infrastructure, traffic, tree canopy, stormwater, water supply, and neighborhood character.

We should look into emulating successful programs such as the Champlain Land Trust in Burlington, VT.

I am a transportation omnivore: I use RTD, walk, bike, and drive. Boulder needs a practical, integrated transportation system that supports these choices while maintaining reliable access for residents, businesses, emergency responders, and visitors.

I support the Core Arterial Network and its base goals, provided projects demonstrate positive outcomes, reasonable costs, maintained traffic throughput, and limited neighborhood cut-through traffic. The city should incorporate lessons from completed projects before committing to the remaining build-out, including effects on travel time, emergency access, maintenance, snow removal, usage, and diversion of traffic to residential streets.

Transportation dollars should prioritize resurfacing streets that are key bike routes or have high daily vehicle volumes before lower-use secondary & tertiary streets.

Downtown Boulder should be clean, safe, welcoming, and economically diverse. I support actions include reducing permitting complexity, and delays; improving cleanliness, lighting, and public safety; supporting predictable regulations; expanding appropriate downtown housing; working with property owners to address high occupancy costs and vacancies.

How can the city work with downtown merchants to adapt to the post-COVID environment of work from home to reverse the drop in business (as measured by sales tax collection) and learn what retail and service mix residents and visitors will embrace with increased spending and patronage.

I support maintaining safe, functional public facilities and addressing legitimate deferred maintenance. However, I do not support Ordinance 8758 in its current form because the measure asks voters to authorize up to $400 million in new debt, with a maximum repayment cost of up to $650 million, before the city provided sufficient project-level scope, cost certainty, prioritization, and accountability protections.

My understanding is if Ordinance 8762 does not pass, the city would not be able to issue all of the bonds as it would exceed current limits. Before asking residents to assume this level of long-term debt, council should show a transparent analysis that distinguishes urgent life-safety needs from desirable improvements; identifies the full cost of each project, possible alternatives as well as future operating costs. If the bond issue does not pass, what work will be prioritized under current debt and funding levels.

Boulder's land-use code should be clearer, more predictable, and easier for residents, small businesses, applicants, and staff to navigate. I support modernizing Title 9, and would commit to a targeted update that defines the issues to be solved, what benefits it will provide and how success can be measured.